Try as I might, I could not make a coherent post from these tidbits.
- The very best debate about HFCS and obesity I have ever read. In fact, it altered my opinion that HFCS was more harmful than it actually is. Be sure to see the comment summary as an example of the blogosphere at its finest.
- The problem with Intelligent Design.
- SRO flights
- My state. My bad.
- Like we didn't know - ethanol really does compete with feed and exports (and wins!)
- Open a wine bottle with your shoe. (Talk about impressing your date!)
John, the attack on Intelligent Design seems to assume we know everything there is to know about creation, for instance, the human eye that is cited. I think that is hubris at best.
ReplyDeleteVA:
ReplyDeleteIt is a pity that the arguments in this debate are usually termed attacks, even when well laid out as this one is.
That being so, I define hubris as arrogance out of touch with reality. The cited article may strike ID proponents as arrogant, but the underlying case is deeply rooted in reality, IMHO.