Another week of Cargill meetings, but at least I'm home at night.
- What's happening in Hungary and why does it creep me out?
- The plutonomy vs. the middle class (highly recommended)
- Where the old "knowing where to hit it" story comes from. And it's true! Also one of my heroes.
- Could rootworms end up doing to ethanol what subsidy critics couldn't?
- Wait, Republicans do want to raise taxes (on some people). Meanwhile, it appears Warren Buffet is right.
- The secret power of pronouns
- Debt-forgiveness ideas seem to be rising to the top.
4 comments:
John debt-forgiveness may in fact be a way to get the economies going again BUT if that were to become the accepted practice why would you or I or any government just run up a huge debt then claim we couldn't pay it back and claim debt-forgiveness? There has to be a penalty! For governments I suggest 1) the individuals responsible never ever be allowed to hold any public office again and 2) That counties financial business be under the "guidance" of a group of the major creditors to ensure the government gets it house in order.
For individuals no more loans --period.
Dave, what do you mean by "the individuals responsible"? That would be the entire government. You can't say this program X (and all who voted for it) is responsible for the debt while program Y isn't. They're all components of the same equation.
Anonymous
If we say debt forgivness is the way to go then to prevent mis-use we HAVE to hold someone responsible. For government debt that would the ELECTED--congresspersons. senators and adminstration and not just the current ones. They are responible for voting in these excessive laws which spend money we don't have--the people don't vote on this stuff.
Maybe it's a poor penalty to say they can never even run again. If you think I'm wrong "what your penalty?"
dave; anon(s):
good comments,thanks. This issue deserves fuller exposition, so I'll try to post some other angles on it soon.
Post a Comment